Devinder Kaur vs Union Of India And Anr on 21 February, 2024


Devinder Kaur vs Union Of India And Anr on 21 February, 2024


Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member services — Free for one month.

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Devinder Kaur vs Union Of India And Anr on 21 February, 2024

Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Vikas Suri

                                                               (THROUGH VC)

                      104

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                                      CHANDIGARH

                                                                                2024:PHHC:023804-DB
                                                                                       CWP-11758-2022
                                                                             Date of Decision: 21.02.2024
                      Devinder Kaur

                                                                                            . . . . Petitioner
                                                                      Vs.
                      Union of India and another
                                                                                         . . . . Respondents

                                             ****
                      CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
                                             ****

                      Present               Mr. Mukul Goyal, Advocate
                                            for the petitioner.

                                            Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Sr. Standing Counsel
                                            for the Income Tax Department/respondents.

                                              ****
                      SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. Counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions.

2. Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

3. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
JUDGE

(VIKAS SURI)
JUDGE
February 21, 2024
Mohit goyal

1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No

2. Whether reportable? Yes/No

MOHIT GOYAL
2024.02.22 15:30
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD