Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member services — Free for one month.
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Tasleema And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 February, 2024
Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill
Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill
2024:PHHC:025360 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRWP-1731-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-23.2.2024 Tasleema and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- None for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
1. Petitioner No.1 – Tasleema aged about 24 years, who is already married to
respondent No.4 – Fateh Mohammad, and petitioner No.2 – Taslim aged
about 22 years, both of whom are in a ‘live-in’ relationship, have approached
this Court seeking issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect
their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of
private respondents No.4 to 11, who do not approve of their ‘live-in’
relationship.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting
anything as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition and
also as regards the sanctity of alleged relationship or age of the petitioners,
the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 –
Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh to look into the matter and to
Pankaj Kakkar
2024.02.23 16:53
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRWP-1731-2024 (O&M) (2) 2024:PHHC:025360
dispose off the representation dated 15.2.2024 (Annexure P-3) in accordance
with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and
liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken
thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners.
3. A copy of this order alongwith copy of the representation dated 15.2.2024
(Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Nuh,
District Nuh so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.
4. It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any
expression as regards the alleged relationship or age of the petitioners and
shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that
they have committed any wrong.
23.2.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Pankaj Kakkar 2024.02.23 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document