Tasleema And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 February, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member services — Free for one month.

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Tasleema And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 February, 2024

Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill

Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill

                                                                           2024:PHHC:025360

                                In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
                                                 At Chandigarh

                                                                   CRWP-1731-2024 (O&M)
                                                                   Date of Decision:-23.2.2024

                Tasleema and another                                            ... Petitioners

                                                      Versus

                State of Haryana and others                                   ... Respondents


                CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

                Present:-          None for the petitioners.

                                   Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana.

                                                      *****

                GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner No.1 – Tasleema aged about 24 years, who is already married to

respondent No.4 – Fateh Mohammad, and petitioner No.2 – Taslim aged

about 22 years, both of whom are in a ‘live-in’ relationship, have approached

this Court seeking issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect

their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of

private respondents No.4 to 11, who do not approve of their ‘live-in’

relationship.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting

anything as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition and

also as regards the sanctity of alleged relationship or age of the petitioners,

the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 –

Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh to look into the matter and to

Pankaj Kakkar
2024.02.23 16:53
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRWP-1731-2024 (O&M) (2) 2024:PHHC:025360

dispose off the representation dated 15.2.2024 (Annexure P-3) in accordance

with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and

liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken

thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners.

3. A copy of this order alongwith copy of the representation dated 15.2.2024

(Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Nuh,

District Nuh so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.

4. It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any

expression as regards the alleged relationship or age of the petitioners and

shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that

they have committed any wrong.



                23.2.2024                                                     ( Gurvinder Singh Gill )
                Pankaj                                                               Judge

                                Whether speaking /reasoned         Yes / No

                                Whether Reportable                 Yes / No




Pankaj Kakkar
2024.02.23 16:53
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document

[ad_2]

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *